SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Enteral Nutrition and Bone Marrow Transplantation

Yvonne Hastings, BA, RGN

Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Melinda White, PhD, BSc (Hons), Grad. Dip. Nutrition-Diet

Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Jeanine Young, PhD, BSc (Hons), RGN

Royal Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of enteral nutrition for pediatric patients undergoing the challenging treatment of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. During the period from January 1999 to May 2000, 15 patients were transplant recipients. On admission to the hospital, 87% of patients were above the 50th percentile for weight for age. Nasogastric tubes were inserted while platelet counts remained greater than 50 x 109 mL/L. A specialized elemental formula for pediatric patients was commenced. These feeds were administered continuously and were titrated until caloric requirement or tolerance level had been achieved. During hospitalization for bone marrow transplantation, enteral nutrition was the major form of nutritional support for all patients. Enteral feeds continued even during maximal gut toxicity and were supported with antiemetics and analgesia. There were insignificant weight fluctuations during hospitalization, with 80% of children above the 50th percentile weight for age being discharged. Enteral nutrition via a nasogastric tube was effective in the provision of nutrition during bone marrow transplantation and continues to have an important role in this unit.

Key Words: pediatric • bone marrow transplantation • nutritional status • nasogastric

Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, Vol. 23, No. 2, 103-110 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1043454205285866


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
J. Cohen and L. Maurice
Adequacy of Nutritional Support in Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplantation
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, January 1, 2010; 27(1): 40 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. L. Thompson and J. Duffy
Nutrition Support Challenges in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2008; 23(5): 533 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement