SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
*Family Issues
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Social Support for School-Aged Siblings of Children With Cancer: A Comparison Between Parent and Sibling Perceptions

John S. Murray, PhD, RN, CPNP, CS, FAAN

This descriptive, exploratory study investigated the social support interventions received by school-aged siblings of children with cancer and which of those interventions are perceived as being helpful. A comparison between the siblings' and parents' perceptions was made. The conceptual framework was guided by House's (1981) work on social support, which includes major categories of support variables including emotional, informational, instrumental, and appraisal support. A nonprobability purposive sample consisted of 50 school-aged siblings of children with cancer and their parents. Subjects completed either the sibling or parent version of the Nurse-Sibling Social Support Questionnaire (NSSSQ). De scriptive statistical analyses were performed to examine NSSSQ helpfulness and frequency scores for both siblings and parents. Paired t tests were used to test the difference between the responses given by siblings and by their parents on the NSSSQ helpfulness and frequency scales. Results demonstrated that siblings perceive interventions aimed at providing emotional and instrumental support as the most helpful. Parents perceived interventions aimed at meeting the siblings' need for emotional and informational support the most beneficial. Parents re ported that siblings receive emotional, informational, and appraisal support more frequently than siblings did.

Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, Vol. 18, No. 3, 90-104 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/104345420101800302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
M. Bjork, T. Wiebe, and I. Hallstrom
Striving to Survive: Families' Lived Experiences When a Child Is Diagnosed With Cancer
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, September 1, 2005; 22(5): 265 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
I. M. Moore
Advancing Biobehavioral Research in Childhood Cancer
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, May 1, 2004; 21(3): 128 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
K. Freeman, C. O'Dell, and C. Meola
Childhood Brain Tumors: Children's and Siblings' Concerns Regarding the Diagnosis and Phase of Illness
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, May 1, 2003; 20(3): 133 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement